about license
- Single Page
Posted 03 November 2011 - 03:46 AM
Please consider. Thank you for your work.
PS. I'm Thai so don't strict in my English. XD
Posted 21 December 2011 - 10:31 AM
Ethaizone's suggestion of MIT seems good to me. It's used by Ruby on Rails, too.
Another option is to use LGPL. This is Lesser GPL. Smarty uses this (see discussion here http://www.smarty.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=20177&highlight=licence+license)
Posted 02 January 2012 - 02:37 AM
Posted 02 January 2012 - 11:30 AM
PS. @onyxriverman , I don't think that to use GPLv3 is a draconian term! They are many custom licenses that for example have: "All copyright information, links and logos within the HTML footer, must remain intact to use this library..." as a LICENSE condition. I chose GPL license to keep this project improved from other developers too. I just didn't know that you have to copy all the files INCLUDED your projects files that use this library.
Posted 02 January 2012 - 16:28 PM
PS. @onyxriverman , I don't think that to use GPLv3 is a draconian term! There really many customs licenses that for example have: "All copyright information, links and logos within the HTML footer, must remain intact to use this library..." as a LICENSE condition. I chose GPL license to keep this project improved from other developers too. I just didn't know that you have to copy all the files INCLUDED your projects files that use this library.
[/quote]
Thank you for replying! I would also like to apologize for using the term draconian. That was a bit extreme and unfair of me.
Without a doubt, you deserve all credit for creating this, and I do not intend to claim it as my own. You will be appropriately credited when your code is used in production.
I will report any bugs or improvements that I can think of, but I am not so certain that I would be able improve on this already elegant solution.
Again I want to thank you for changing the license. I hope that one day, I can compensate you for your effort.